On Thursday, the Prime Minister gave a significant speech on the role of business in the Big Society. Those who have been following me on this blog will know that I believe that we are in a period of significant transition as economic power shifts from West to East, as technology changes our expectations and opens up new opportunities, as we acknowledge that there are many intractable social problems that state action alone cannot solve, and above all as our population ages, making it harder to maintain the same approach to running our society as before as baby boomers start to retire on masse. This change, combined with the need to reduce our deficit (or at least not to keep increasing our annual spend exponentially), has implications for local authorities and the voluntary and community sector, who will have significant opportunities and freedoms in the medium term, but will face challenges over the coming 12-18 months in terms of transition.
But what about business? Well on Thursday, the Prime Minister set out a vision which gives us some clues. The role of business in this transition, and how it can itself transition, has three elements.
The first is to (continue) to be responsible. In exchange for government seeking to provide an operating environment over the longer term of economic stability, lower taxation, and less red tape, business is offered a deal in which by taking responsibility, demand is reduced for public services from social breakdown and injustice, which provides the means for government in turn to provide the enabling environment that business needs. So business is being invited to continue to treat its employees fairly, pay them well, adhere to the law, treat suppliers fairly and pay them promptly, not exploit workers or customers alike, not abuse market power or position – all the things that all businesses should do. But business is also encouraged to look at how it can at times knowingly or unknowingly harm social as well as environment capital, accelerating social breakdown perhaps through its approach to local planning, supply chains, and hiring, or not being a long-term investor in people and places. On Thursday, business was asked to do more, which is to take part in Every Business Commits, a movement of businesses who take on board voluntarily priorities outlined by government that will enable the building of the Big Society. Every Business Commits has five voluntary pledges that business can sign up for around which government will pledge to work in a coordinated way so the asks of business becomes less confusing:
- Reduce carbon and protect the environment
- Improve skills and create jobs
- Support your community
- Improve quality of life and well-being
- Support small and medium sized enterprises
The second way that business can help, particularly in these difficult times, is to support the efforts of local government bodies such as local authorities, and particularly voluntary and community organisations – especially small front-line ones which it is harder for government to support (for example through its Transition Fund) – with the fundraising, marketing, HR/volunteer management, governance, and financial skills support they will need, as well as any other resources such as access to space and funds that they might be able to provide locally harnessing the generosity of customers and employees. As part of this, an initiative has been launched as a collaboration between government and businesses, called the Business Connectors programme. Further details will follow in the coming months, but the programme builds on existing highly successful models in many businesses around the country in which staff locally (such as a store manager) are seconded or freed up to help identify needs in communities that local businesses could help with, and broker in the relevant skills, finances, and other assets that are needed that business could provide, harnessing online and offline tools, and coordinating with local stakeholders such as local government and local representatives of civil society. Where it has been operating it can be a great way to help streamline and make less confusing cooperation between business and communities, avoid duplication, and help businesses and their employees do more and to be more effective in their philanthropy, volunteering, and (social) investment support. An area that will need to be thought through in particular is how to support communities which lack a significant business presence, particularly in deprived areas where a more national/local approach may be needed.
Over the medium term, harnessing the creativity and resources from businesses, together with the public and voluntary sectors, this kind of collaboration could help tackle some of the challenges around unlocking the capacity and hidden wealth of citizens – their time, finances, and leadership – which will be needed to build the Big Society.
The third and final way for many businesses to get involved in building the Big Society, is by empowering citizens through their own business models, supporting them to take more control over their lives. This could be by pursuing opportunities to provide public services in more responsive and effective ways than government alone. Or it could be through the products they make that create genuine social benefit and lower the costs for citizens to access services that improve their lives. Or it could be by harnessing citizens’ own energy to put them more in charge of a customer experience – whether through models such as we find on the internet (we essentially volunteer every day for Spotify or Apple, to create our own experiences of music and share knowledge and entertainment with our friends – also known as collaborative consumption) or for example through the People’s Supermarket, where customers help volunteer to stack shelves and get really affordable organic food as a consequence. Such business hybrids, social businesses, time-credit based businesses and social enterprises, citizen franchises, and freemium models represent in my view the cutting edge of business today, and stand alongside more traditional forms of businesses such as mutuals, cooperatives, and employee-owned trusts and partnerships by blurring the distinction between value created for the business, and value created for individual customers, and value created for communities. In effect they can offer when well-designed a win-win-win for all concerned.
As is often the case with transition, there will be many challenges and barriers to overcome. Business in the Community’s report on 300 businesses’ response to the Big Society highlights a number of areas that will need to be addressed collectively: less red tape around volunteering to enable employees to more quickly get involved in communities whilst still protecting children and health generally; a less onerous approach from the competition authorities when businesses collaborate to improve their communities; and reforming the benefits system to make it more possible for businesses to employ on a casual and part-time basis people who are on job-seekers’ allowance so they can gain experience.
But the good news is that businesses are up for the challenge. 77% of business leaders participating in the report survey say they could do more to scale up strategic support for communities across their business, while 80% feel they could do more to engage other businesses to scale up their support. The benefits businesses most feel they get from being engaged are in terms of employee motivation and the ability to draw in more employees from excluded backgrounds, the ability to build sustainable communities (and in turn sustainable businesses and revenues), and in terms of brand and local relationships.
During this transition we will need as much help as we can get. With the private sector experiencing greater growth now than previously, there is an opportunity for businesses to help all of us transition and get ready to be able to make the most of the new landscape which the Big Society will create.
The Great Transition through building the Big Society should provide a new space for innovation between businesses and the wider world, whether this is public services, the community and voluntary sector, or communities and citizens. As Nat Wei’s feature above highlights, there are many ways in which businesses can help with skills, resources, and support for volunteering and there are positive indications that businesses want to rise to the challenge.
It would be interesting to explore how in a balanced Big Society businesses will also open themselves to transformation through contributions from as well as to communities. There are lots of examples of ‘reverse mentoring’ and community contributions which enable businesses to focus more clearly on the social value of their activities, acquire skills and insights which strengthen recruitment and retention, and improve industrial democracy.
Tessy Britton’s recent blog piece on Braddock and Levis touches on the unease caused by imbalanced relations between businesses and communities. In my response to Tessy’s piece I suggested that judgements about the value of such partnerships need to be informed by questioning:
• do we accept that the creation of social or public good coexists with the creation of shareholder value?
• is the collaborative approach between business and the community also reflected in the company’s engagement with its own workers?
• does the story-telling (or PR) by the company include the community as active and strong voice or is it just a walk-on part?
• who has the power to determine what actions are supported and how they are communicated?
• how does the business open itself to community inputs – e.g. do community members mentor business leaders on social impact etc.?
If the answers to an increasing number of these questions are positive, we will see a Great Transition towards a stronger culture and practice of participation and public value creation by businesses and communities. And if we can create the right roles for government and democratic institutions to nurture, broker and regulate these participatory developments we may find that concerns about fairness and inequality can also be addressed.
Nat – I agree that “business can help…support the efforts of local authorities, and particularly voluntary and community organisations”…without money changing hands.
Help ‘in kind’ (professional advice, craft skills, form filling etc) can be a valuable gift from companies to community groups.
James
As you say Nat “there will be many challenges and barriers to overcome”….CONSISTENCY is key….and it’s not happening.
Take for example the Government axing funding for PlanningAid which, through 1,200 volunteers, helps communities with free planning advice.
So in terms of Big Society there are professional volunteers, helping communities, contributing to localism & Neighbourhood Plans…..surely something to be supported?
It doesn’t make sense to destroy this excellent, longstanding, service at a time when it’s most needed.
Are there people and communities out there ready to make a go of social enterprises and mutuals but worried that they have little if any experience of the business of business?
Are there companies large and small who could inject some of their experience and expertise into these fledgling projects as another way of showing they can make a contribution to this change?
One of things that’s worried me in the past about Government and the public sector trying to set up social enterprises has been the lack of proper business skills – too much emphasis on social and no emphasis on enterprise.
Are there local businesses out there with an appetite for plugging this gap in their area?
Could it be that business is part of the problem as much as it might be a solution? Albeit that part of business that played fast and loose with securitisation, derivatives and tax avoidance. To keep harking back to the failed brand that is finance is not exactly a firm edifice to build from.
How many businesses did we see flocking to the LSP table even when times were good?
BS needs integrity not back door privitisation hyped up as devolution of power.
It is true that there are some opportunities around the new and emerging market opened up by the cuts but lets be real – those kind of opportunities are not for the likes of community groups and volunteers – we’re talking SERCO and super brand charities here – which means ‘winner takes all’ and a smaller, weaker civil society – this is what is happening right now
The problem is that everyone, govt advisers included, come at it from their own ideological prejudice, and re-heated homilies about business are never going to be enough
The big society vision of a stronger civil society was broadly right – we need stronger communities, but the execution of policy is going in the opposite direction